Apr 19, 2016 10:21:36 AM
There seems to be a trend of automotive products such as IVI Systems and Instrument Cluster among others that are using web based applications for all purposes such as media playback, vehicle information, etc.
The other option for these applications is native application. So the question we must ask: Which one is better - Web based or native?
With Web based applications, car infotainment system, instrument cluster OEMs will be able to reuse applications across all their products. This is very important because OEMs will have products based on multiple operating systems - QNX, ITRON, Android, Linux. OEMs will prefer to reuse from the perspective of cost saving, time-to-market and consistent UX.
Are web technologies ready to cater to automotive needs? Though web technologies are standardized and easily to use, automotive related extensions have to be included and standardized. I have outlined the related features that have to be included in web technology components such as web-kit for automotive platform:
The security aspects taken care of in existing technologies/standards have to be evaluated considering the highest safety and security measures that are very critical in automotive.
Of course, native applications/frameworks will enable the custom/native capabilities/effects. It is a tradeoff between consistent UX, reuse of applications and the usage of native capabilities/effects. Looks like, OEMs prefer the former because cost and time-to-market is important since automotive productization itself is a long process.
Author: Krishna Kishore, Senior Architect
Apr 19, 2016 10:21:36 AM
There seems to be a trend of automotive products such as IVI Systems and Instrument Cluster among others that are using web based applications for all purposes such as media playback, vehicle information, etc.
The other option for these applications is native application. So the question we must ask: Which one is better - Web based or native?
With Web based applications, car infotainment system, instrument cluster OEMs will be able to reuse applications across all their products. This is very important because OEMs will have products based on multiple operating systems - QNX, ITRON, Android, Linux. OEMs will prefer to reuse from the perspective of cost saving, time-to-market and consistent UX.
Are web technologies ready to cater to automotive needs? Though web technologies are standardized and easily to use, automotive related extensions have to be included and standardized. I have outlined the related features that have to be included in web technology components such as web-kit for automotive platform:
The security aspects taken care of in existing technologies/standards have to be evaluated considering the highest safety and security measures that are very critical in automotive.
Of course, native applications/frameworks will enable the custom/native capabilities/effects. It is a tradeoff between consistent UX, reuse of applications and the usage of native capabilities/effects. Looks like, OEMs prefer the former because cost and time-to-market is important since automotive productization itself is a long process.
Author: Krishna Kishore, Senior Architect
Sasken is a specialist in Product Engineering and Digital Transformation providing concept-to-market, chip-to-cognition R&D services to global leaders in Semiconductor, Automotive, Industrials, Consumer Electronics, Enterprise Devices, SatCom, and Transportation industries.
Sasken Technologies Ltd
(formerly Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd)
139/25, Ring Road, Domlur, Bengaluru 560071, India
CIN# L72100KA1989PLC014226